<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joseline M. Santos</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Raquel C. Adriano</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marian Minneli S. Cruz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mayleen Dorcas B. Castro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eunice B. Custodio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gerriper T. Bernardo</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DIGITIZING EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES: DEVELOPMENT OF LEARNING MATERIALS REPOSITORY HUB</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Education in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alternative Delivery Mode Learning Resource (ADMLR)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Digitized Learning Materials (DLM)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Learning Materials Repository Hub (LMRH)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">System Usability Scale (SUS)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">April/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/457-1746640668.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">83</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This study developed a Learning Materials Repository Hub (LMRH) to digitize educational resources for the K-12 education system, addressing the need for centralized, high-quality, and accessible learning materials. Using a developmental research approach, Graduate School students created Digitized Learning Materials (DLMs) aligned with the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs) and the Alternative Delivery Mode Learning Resource (ADMLR) standards of the Department of Education (DepEd). These materials were reviewed by subject-matter experts and integrated into the LMRH, which was designed as a centralized platform for organizing and sharing digital learning content. The study employed expert evaluations and teacher assessments to determine the content quality, educational effectiveness, technical usability, and overall acceptability of the LMRH. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used to measure perceived usefulness, ease of use, attitude toward using, and intention to use, while the System Usability Scale (SUS) evaluated its usability. Findings revealed that the DLMs received high ratings for quality, and the LMRH was deemed effective in supporting both synchronous and asynchronous learning. Teachers strongly agreed on its usefulness and ease of integration into teaching. The results suggest that digital learning repositories can significantly enhance teaching and learning experiences, providing a flexible and efficient platform for educators. The study highlights the importance of digitized educational resources and encourages further investment in educational technology to improve curriculum implementation and educational delivery in K-12 education.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">237-260</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joseline M. Santos</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GOOGLE CLASSROOM: BEYOND THE TRADITIONAL SETTING</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Education in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">active system use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">behavioral intention</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Google Classroom</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">perceived ease of use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">perceived usefulness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology acceptance</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://oaji.net/articles/2021/457-1628687350.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">79</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This research explored the participants’ use of Google Classroom and evaluated its acceptability using the Technology Acceptability Model (TAM). The respondents were limited to 56 teachers enrolled in the research methodology class in a graduate school of a certain university in Bulacan during the first semester of the school year 2019-2020. The study utilized a mixed-method design. Triangulated were the result of the TAM survey, the analysis of the open-ended survey, and the record of the submission frequency of the respondents through Google Classroom. The descriptive approach was also utilized to describe the respondents' technology acceptance when using Google Classroom through the administration of the TAM survey questionnaire. The study also determined which TAM factor affected the consistency of the use of Google Classroom the most. Among the factors, actual system use appeared to have significantly affected the respondents' consistency of using Google Classroom. A separate open-ended survey was conducted to verify the data derived from the TAM survey questionnaire. The open-ended survey revealed that despite the difficulty of having a good internet connection, all of the respondents agreed that Google Classroom is very useful, easy to use and would recommend its use to others.  The consistency of actual use, through online submission, was recorded and served as the dependent variable. In terms of consistency, it was observed that 62.5% of the respondents were able to submit 11 to 12 out of 12 total number of activities through Google Classroom.  It was concluded that the use of Google Classroom, though a new experience, made them realize how their life as a teacher can be more comfortable with the use of this technology. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">626-639</style></section></record></records></xml>