SCIENCE COMMUNICATION AND EPISTEMIC TRUST THROUGH SCIENCE EDUCATION: THE MODERATED MEDIATION ROLE OF EPISTEMIC RESPONSIBILITY

TitleSCIENCE COMMUNICATION AND EPISTEMIC TRUST THROUGH SCIENCE EDUCATION: THE MODERATED MEDIATION ROLE OF EPISTEMIC RESPONSIBILITY
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2025
AuthorsDemirtürk, S, Uzun, F, İltar, L, Yeşil, Y, Koçak, M, Yıldırım, S, Tekeli, M, Şahin, M, Günbayı, İ, Varlık, S
JournalJournal of Baltic Science Education
Volume24
Issue4
Start Page637-654
Paginationcontinuous
Date PublishedAugust/2025
Type of ArticleOriginal article
ISSN1648-3898
Other NumbersE-ISSN 2538-7138
Keywordsepistemic responsibility, epistemic trust, science communication, science education, science teacher
Abstract

Science communication and education play a vital role in making scientific knowledge accessible and trustworthy in society. However, declining trust in scientific authority, the proliferation of disinformation, and epistemic crises underscore the heightened responsibility of scientists and educators. This study investigates the moderated mediation role of epistemic responsibility in the correlation between science communication and epistemic trust through science education. Adopting an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, the research first employed qualitative focus group interviews with purposively sampled expert science. Thematic analysis identified key patterns, informing the subsequent quantitative phase, where a validated scale was developed through rigorous reliability and validity testing. Results confirmed that epistemic responsibility functions as a moderated mediation between science communication and epistemic trust within science education. The findings emphasize the need for educational policies to foster students’ epistemic sensitivity via ethics-based and inquiry-driven learning environments. By integrating qualitative insights with quantitative validation, this study contributes to addressing epistemic challenges in science communication and education, offering practical implications for enhancing trust and accountability in scientific discourse.

URLhttps://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=4575701
DOI10.33225/jbse/25.24.637
Refereed DesignationRefereed
Full Text