<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arunee Eambaipreuk</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Narumon Emarat</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kwan Arayathanitkul</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SUPPORTING CONCEPTUAL AND COGNITIVE PROGRESSION: INTEGRATING FLIPPED DESIGN AND PEER INSTRUCTION INTO  AN UPPER-SECONDARY PHYSICS TUTORIAL MODEL</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">flipped design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">peer instruction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">physics tutorials</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SOLO taxonomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">upper-secondary physics</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2026</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August / 2026</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2026/987-1789235123.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A tutorial model for upper-secondary physics that combines peer instruction and a flipped design was developed to replace a lecture-based teaching approach. Implemented in two upper-secondary schools (N = 149), the intervention integrated pre-class preparation, structured worksheets, demonstrations, peer discussions, and mini-laboratories. Learning outcomes were evaluated through pre/post-tests, SOLO taxonomy coding, and semi-structured interviews, with test and interview protocols thoroughly examined for content validity (IOC = 0.73) and reliability (KR-20 = 0.78). A paired-samples t-test indicated significant improvements in students' conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills (p &lt; .001, Cohen’s d = 3.72 and 5.21), alongside substantial normalized gains (g = 0.76 and 0.77). Consistent with these quantitative results, SOLO analysis revealed a progression from prestructural and unistructural reasoning toward predominantly relational reasoning across the three physics topics. Thematic analysis of interview data (n = 34) further suggested that scaffolded worksheets and collaborative sense-making appeared to help students overcome cognitive bottlenecks, while also showing positive links to their engagement and confidence. Together, these findings suggest that a tutorial model integrating peer instruction and a flipped design can offer a viable pedagogical strategy for supporting conceptual and cognitive progression in physics.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">617-630</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tolga   Gok</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE, SKILL AND CONFIDENCE WITH PEER INSTRUCTION AND FORMAL EDUCATION</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">formal education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">peer instruction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">problem solving strategy steps</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">October/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://oaji.net/articles/2015/987-1425811314.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The effects of peer instruction (PI) and formal education (FE) on students’ performance, skill, and confidence were investigated. The research was performed in a two-year college classroom with 98 students from two groups enrolled in a physics course. One of the groups was selected as an experimental group, and the other was the control group. The students in the experimental group were instructed by peer instruction with problem solving strategy steps (PSSS), whereas the students in the control group were instructed by formal education including PSSS. The research data were collected with the Physics Achievement Test (PAT) and the Problem Solving Confidence Questionnaire (PSCQ). The problem solving skills of the students in both groups were evaluated using quantitative problems in Newtonian mechanics. The PAT and the PSCQ results related to the performance and confidence of the students indicated that there was a statistically significant difference between the means of the experimental group and the control group in favor of the experimental group. The combination of PI with PSSS was more effective for increasing the problem solving skills of the students than the combination of FE with PSSS.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">747-758</style></section></record></records></xml>