<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shuang Xu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yanbing Li</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yi Zou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiao Huang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tao Hu</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CORRELATION BETWEEN TEACHERS’ DISCOURSE STRATEGIES AND THE QUALITY OF STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE IN WHOLE-CLASS TEACHING</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cognitive demand</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">discursive move</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scientific discourse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">teacher’s question</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">whole-class teaching</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1724480722.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teachers’ discourse is instrumental in facilitating the emergence of students’ scientific discourse. Many studies have shown that teachers’ cognitive demand levels and discursive moves are the main factors in eliciting students’ scientific discourse, but few focus on whole-class (non-grouped) teaching settings. This research explored the correlation between teachers’ discourse strategies (the cognitive demand of questions and discursive moves) and students’ scientific discourse quality in whole-class teaching without intervention. Applying the chi-square test, correspondence analysis, and content analysis, the study revealed the correlation structure between teachers’ discourse strategies and students’ scientific discourse quality. The teachers’ lower (remembering and understanding) cognitive demand questions, primarily elicited students’ low-quality (everyday discourse and elementary) scientific discourse responses. High (analyzing and creating) cognitive demand questions, primarily elicited students’ high-quality (moderate and advanced) scientific discourse responses. The teachers’ discursive moves also elicited students’ high-quality scientific discourse, particularly following the teacher’s high cognitive demand questions. High-control discursive moves (e.g., “providing opinion”) elicited students’ moderate scientific discourse responses, and low-control discursive moves (“allocation and organization”) elicited students’ moderate and advanced scientific discourse responses. Based on these findings, suggestions were made for science teachers.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">786-800</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yi Zou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lizhen Jin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiao Huang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yanbing Li</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ASSESSMENT OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN STUDENT LEARNING OF MOON PHASES</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">assessment of conceptual understanding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">level division</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moon phases</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">qualitative analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quantitative analysis</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August/2023</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1693508291.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Many research studies have shown that lower-secondary school students’ scientific literacy depends on their understanding of corresponding scientific concepts. Therefore, it is of great significance to model and assess students’ conceptual understanding in learning specific scientific concepts, because it can reflect and diagnose students’ cognitive characteristics, so as to provide evidence for targeted educational interventions. However, on the topic of Moon Phases, existing research studies have deficiencies in the evaluation and analysis of different levels of students’ conceptual understanding, which restrict teachers to take effective educational interventions to help them. Thus, this study explored a new level division and an assessment test for revealing and explaining students’ different conceptual understanding in learning Moon Phases. This study was conducted among 768 Chinese lower-secondary school students. Through a variety of quantitative and qualitative analyses, it was found that students’ conceptual understanding of Moon Phases can be divided into three levels of continuous improvement, including the mechanical memory of different phenomena of moon phases, the formation of a preliminary mental model of Moon Phases, and the construction of a complete mental model of Moon Phases. Accordingly, this study made some precise suggestions for effectively improving students’ conceptual understanding of Moon Phases.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">719-736</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yi Zou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xinyu Xue</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lizhen Jin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiao Huang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yanbing Li</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IMPROVING LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION OF BUOYANCY THROUGH ENHANCING THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF THE NATURE OF BUOYANCY</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">conceptual framework</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge integration of buoyancy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scientific concept understanding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">the nature of buoyancy</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">December/2023</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1702729488.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In recent years, developing students’ knowledge integration of specific topics through effective teaching methods has been a concern in science education. This study explored an alternative teaching method, which aims to help lower secondary school students develop their knowledge structure about buoyancy towards a logically integrated conceptual framework through enhancing their understanding of the nature of buoyancy. Specifically, this study constructed a conceptual framework on buoyancy and a set of matching test questions to map out the three levels of knowledge integration of students, and designed and implemented a teaching experiment of promoting students’ understanding of the nature of buoyancy. Through quantitative and qualitative analysis, it was found that the knowledge integration development of the treatment group was significantly better than that of the control group. The results indicated that enhancing students’ understanding of the nature of buoyancy can effectively improve their knowledge integration of buoyancy. Accordingly, improving knowledge integration through enhancing students’ understanding of the nature of the specific scientific concept may be a new direction for future research.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1120-1136</style></section></record></records></xml>