<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shuang Xu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yanbing Li</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yi Zou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiao Huang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tao Hu</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CORRELATION BETWEEN TEACHERS’ DISCOURSE STRATEGIES AND THE QUALITY OF STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE IN WHOLE-CLASS TEACHING</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cognitive demand</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">discursive move</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scientific discourse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">teacher’s question</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">whole-class teaching</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1724480722.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teachers’ discourse is instrumental in facilitating the emergence of students’ scientific discourse. Many studies have shown that teachers’ cognitive demand levels and discursive moves are the main factors in eliciting students’ scientific discourse, but few focus on whole-class (non-grouped) teaching settings. This research explored the correlation between teachers’ discourse strategies (the cognitive demand of questions and discursive moves) and students’ scientific discourse quality in whole-class teaching without intervention. Applying the chi-square test, correspondence analysis, and content analysis, the study revealed the correlation structure between teachers’ discourse strategies and students’ scientific discourse quality. The teachers’ lower (remembering and understanding) cognitive demand questions, primarily elicited students’ low-quality (everyday discourse and elementary) scientific discourse responses. High (analyzing and creating) cognitive demand questions, primarily elicited students’ high-quality (moderate and advanced) scientific discourse responses. The teachers’ discursive moves also elicited students’ high-quality scientific discourse, particularly following the teacher’s high cognitive demand questions. High-control discursive moves (e.g., “providing opinion”) elicited students’ moderate scientific discourse responses, and low-control discursive moves (“allocation and organization”) elicited students’ moderate and advanced scientific discourse responses. Based on these findings, suggestions were made for science teachers.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">786-800</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yi Zou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lizhen Jin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yanbing Li</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tao Hu</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION IN STUDENT LEARNING OF BUOYANT FORCE</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">assessment of knowledge integration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">buoyant force</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">central idea</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">conceptual framework</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scientific concept understanding</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August/2022</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2022/987-1662187488.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Students’ problem-solving ability depends on their understanding of related scientific concepts. Therefore, the modeling and assessment of students’  understanding of specific scientific concepts is important to promote students’ problem-solving ability, as it can find students’ understanding difficulties and explore breakthrough strategies accordingly. Inspired by the theory of knowledge integration and combined with the situational characteristics of science education in China, this study established a conceptual framework about buoyant force, which was applied to model students’ different understandings of it. And based on the established framework, an assessment of buoyant force was designed and tested among 622 Chinese lower-secondary school students. Through the analysis of the test data and the interview outcomes, it was found that students’ understanding of buoyant force could be divided into three levels of knowledge integration including novice, intermediate, and expert. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that an emphasis on the nature of buoyant force can be an effective strategy to help students achieve a deeper conceptual understanding of buoyant force, leading to a more integrated knowledge structure.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">720-738</style></section></record></records></xml>